New Autism numbers “Case Study in total depravity”
Note: Thank you to Laura Hayes for bringing this article from Toby Rogers’ Substack to my attention. I’ve excerpted and linked to the full article, which you can read without a subscription. I just subscribed for the full year. It’s important to support each other. And here comes April with the blue month of celebration. We may never know who decided autism was going to become a difference to be celebrated or ignored, depending where one is on the spectrum. I’d start with Anthony Fauci – he’s been in power since the rate was 1 in 10,000.
###
Newly released autism prevalence estimates show that the iatrogenocide is expanding
The mainstream narrative lies in ruins and the CDC response is a case study in total depravity
Toby Rogers
Mar 28
I. Introduction
The new autism numbers came out last Thursday. We all knew that they would be bad because nearly every prevalence report for the last 20 years has shown increasing rates. We also knew that once again the CDC and mainstream media would try to spin increasing prevalence as “good news” in the Orwellian way that they do.
Let’s walk through the two reports and then have a brief conversation about what we do about this.
II. The new numbers
There are several systems for tracking autism prevalence in the U.S. including the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM), National Survey for Children’s Health (NSCH), and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). There are also federal programs including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that have their own counts.
The two reports that came out on Thursday were from ADDM which tends to estimate lower autism prevalence (owing to slightly different research methods) than some of the other surveys.
There are 11 ADDM sites across the country (Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin). Every two years they conduct a study of autism rates in a defined geographic region within the state (in as few as one county in Arizona, to as many as 21 counties in Arkansas). ADDM sites generally measure autism rates in 8-year-olds (almost all children with autism will be diagnosed by that age and such “constant age tracking” allows for more accurate comparisons between different birth cohorts). They are very thorough — reviewing diagnostic evaluations and school records for every child in that defined region. It takes them three years to write up the report (which is extremely unfortunate given the stakes). The main study that was just released looked at children born in 2012 who were studied in 2020.
The headline was 1 in 36 children in the U.S. have autism which is an increase of 18% from the ADDM report (1 in 44) released just two years ago.
I was quoted in an article by Brenda Baletti at Children’s Health Defense about the new numbers, “1 in 36 Kids Have Autism, CDC Says — Critics Slam Agency’s Failure to Investigate Causes.”
Cynthia Nevison wrote a brilliant analysis of the latest reports that was published by Children’s Health Defense on Friday titled, “In New Autism Report, CDC Again Fails to Address Root Causes.”
Dr. Nevison also discussed the reports on the Friday Roundtable of CHD.tv.
III. Boys are 3.8 times more likely to have autism than girls
1 in 36 = 2.78% of all kids in the U.S. have autism, according to the main study. There is variability across the ADDM sites from a low of 2.31% in Maryland to a high of 4.49% in California. But remember, autism is 3.8 times higher among boys than girls. So the autism rate among boys in California in 2020 was 6.94%.
Every f*cking Democrat in California swore that vaccines were not linked to autism, they mandated one of the most extreme childhood vaccine schedules in the world in order for kids to go to school, and voilà 6.94% of boys in the state now have autism.
This is genocide, democide, and androcide. Yes, I am aware of the fact that these children are “just” poisoned and injured for life, not murdered outright (although the SIDS numbers are also appalling). But this is a systematic destruction of a people nonetheless.
IV. The way that the CDC has weaponized equity to promote genocide is sinister
In 2019, Cynthia Nevison was one of the first scholars to spot the fact that Black and Hispanic autism rates had surpassed autism rates in the White community (apologies for the capitalizations of the various races, not my preference, I get that race is a social construct, that’s just how they do it in these reports). During the battle against SB276 in 2019 (that removed all MEDICAL exemptions to vaccinations) we shared this information with elected officials including Lorena Gonzalez (who was chair of the California Latino Legislative Caucus at the time), but they voted to continue genociding their own base anyway.
Black and Hispanic autism rates exceed the rate in the White population in the most recent ADDM studies as well.
Hispanic autism rates are 30% higher in 8-year-olds (born in 2012) and 80% higher in 4-year-olds (born in 2016) as compared with White children of the same age.
Black autism rates are 20% higher for 8-year-olds (born in 2012) and 60% higher for 4-year-olds (born in 2016) as compared with White children of the same age.
SB277 (that removed the personal belief exemption to vaccine mandates) passed in 2015. So the 2016 birth cohort is the first post-SB277 generation. The autism numbers are every bit as horrifying as we predicted they would be and contradict Democratic claims about vaccine safety.
As Black and Hispanic rates were rising the CDC spun it as good news because they claimed it meant more Black and Hispanic kids had access to diagnostic testing. Now that Black and Hispanic autism rates exceed White rates that narrative does not make sense. Dr. Nevison explains:
The apparent underlying assumption was that there is a natural genetic level of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the population, which is reflected in White prevalence, and that all races and ethnicities will eventually stabilize at that level thanks to improved outreach and screening.
The new ADDM report recognizes that, “For the first time… the prevalence of ASD was lower among White children than among other racial and ethnic groups, reversing the direction of racial and ethnic differences in ASD prevalence observed in the past.” However, the authors neglect to acknowledge that this reversal undermines the hopeful interpretation of previous ADDM data and effectively turns the equity argument on its head.
But the CDC is sticking with the equity script regardless of the data. The last sentence of the main report states,
These data indicate that ASD is common across all groups of children and underscore the considerable need for equitable and accessible screening, services, and supports for all children.
That’s not actually what these data indicate. These data indicate that American children are being poisoned at an astronomical rate and Black and Hispanic children are being poisoned even more than White children at this point.
V. Higher socioeconomic status is now associated with lower autism rates — once again contradicting the official narrative
In 9 of the 11 ADDM sites, those in the highest third of income had the lowest autism rates (although only 3 of those results were statistically significant). Presumably, those with the most income have the greatest access to testing and diagnostic services — and yet their autism rates are the lowest. Ask yourself: what is different about White and wealthy populations as compared with the rest of the population?
VI. The data on 4-year-olds is even worse
And then there was the second report released on Thursday — early identification of autism among 4-year-olds in 2020. The study found an astonishing 4.64% of four-year-olds in San Diego have autism. But remember autism is more prevalent in boys than girls so this works out to a 7.2% autism rate for boys in San Diego. For Black and Hispanic boys the results are even worse. Dr. Nevison explains:
The race-specific prevalence of the boys was not explicitly stated, but one can back-calculate that it was about 8% for both Blacks and Hispanics.
As the 2016 birth cohort ages and is fully diagnosed, a substantially higher prevalence can be expected, likely exceeding 10% for Black and Hispanic boys in California.
Again, this is the first post-SB277 generation. The law was phased in over time so the 2018 birth cohort will likely have even higher autism prevalence. Then SB276 passed in 2019, removing all medical exemptions to vaccination, so autism prevalence in the 2020 birth cohort and beyond will likely be even worse (perhaps offset somewhat by lower vaccination rates during the pandemic).
San Diego is Lorena Gonzalez’s former Assembly District. Asm. Gonzalez spent the better part of her career in the Assembly ridiculing the parents of vaccine-injured children. And now the autism rates in her former assembly district are among the highest in the country — particularly for Hispanic and Black children. Read the full article at UTobian, Tob Rogers’ Substack.
###
By Edward Dowd
Follow Ed Dowd on Twitter for in depth coverage of the problems facing the banking & capital markets today. @DowdEdward
The book begins with a close look at the actual human reality behind the statistics, and when you see the people who are represented by the dry term Excess Mortality, it’s difficult to accept so many unexpected sudden deaths of young athletes, known to be the healthiest among us. Similarly, when lots of healthy teenagers and young adults die in their sleep without obvious reason, collapse and die on a family outing, or fall down dead while playing sports, that all by itself raises an immediate public health concern. Or at least it used to.
Ask yourself if you recall seeing these kinds of things occurring during your own life—in junior high? In high school? In college? How many times in your life did you hear of a performer dropping dead on stage in mid-performance? Your own life experience and intuition will tell you that what you’re about to see is not normal.
Or at least it wasn’t normal before 2021.
By Dr. Pierre Kory
Follow Dr. Kory on Twitter here. Support is so important.
Big Pharma and health agencies cry “Don’t take ivermectin!” A media storm follows. Why then, does the science say the opposite?
Ivermectin is a dirty word in the media. The drug has been derided and declared useless. Doctors have earnestly recorded pleas asking those afflicted with COVID-19 not to take the drug. But why?
The War on Ivermectin is the personal and professional narrative of Dr. Pierre Kory, the co-founder of an expert group of physicians’, and his plight to alert the world of his group’s identification of ivermectin as a highly-effective, life-saving, widely available generic medicine with an obvious ability to end the global pandemic. In this book, Dr. Kory details all the personal attacks, professional setbacks, and concerted, corrupt, and highly effective actions which influenced the world’s major health agencies and medical journals to dismiss and deny it’s efficacy.
Related Stories
For the rest of this article please go to source link below.