Limiting daily TV time to one hour or less may protect your heart

Limiting daily TV time to one hour or less may protect your heart

Limiting daily TV time to one hour or less may protect your heart

Fact checked by Nick Blackmer

Key Takeaways

  • According to a new study, watching more than four hours of television per day could be associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease—whether or not you have a genetic risk for it.
  • Recreational computer or tablet use did not appear to increase the risk of heart disease among people in the study.
  • The researchers said that about 11% of cases of coronary heart disease could be prevented if people watched one hour or less of TV per day.

Cutting your daily TV time down to under an hour may help reduce your risk of coronary artery disease, according to a study from the United Kingdom.1

The study, published last month in BMC Medicine, suggests 11% of coronary artery disease cases could be prevented if a person went from watching more than two hours of TV a day to less than one hour a day.

People who watched television for less than an hour had a 16% lower rate of developing coronary artery disease than people who watched four hours or more per day, and people who watched two to three hours of television per day had a 6% lower risk.1 These findings held true regardless of a person’s genetic predisposition to heart disease.

What Is Coronary Artery Disease?

Coronary artery disease (CAD) occurs when blood vessels are too clogged to deliver oxygen-rich blood to the heart. Plaque buildup and a lack of blood flow can damage the heart muscle, potentially causing a heart attack.2

Youngwon Kim, PhD, the lead researcher on the study and an assistant professor in the School of Public Health at the University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, told Verywell that up to 40% of cardiovascular disease risk can be attributed to genetics. His team wanted to explore to what extent sedentary lifestyle habits influenced risk independently of genetics.

“[This study] provides strong evidence on the potential role that limiting time sitting and watching TV could play in the prevention of coronary heart disease,” Kim said.

Kim said looking at a computer screen did not seem to increase the risk of heart disease. But he clarified the study only looked at “leisure-time computer use,” not time spent at a computer screen for work, gaming, or watching videos.

To conduct the study, researchers from the University of Cambridge and the University of Hong Kong used data and genetic information collected from more than 370,000 people in the UK Biobank study cohort (which includes tissue samples from about half a million people who also completed questionnaires about their lifestyles and habits).

The participants’ blood samples were evaluated for 300 gene variants known to have a role in heart disease.

People with high “polygenic risk” scores (i.e., the combined effects of many genetic variants) may have a lifetime risk of about 40% for developing coronary heart disease.3

Less TV, Lower Risk?

The study did not provide definitive proof that there is a causal relationship between TV viewing and heart disease. However, Tracie Barnett, PhD, an associate professor in the department of family medicine at McGill University in Montreal and a national volunteer expert for the American Heart Association, told Verywell that the findings are “very compelling.”

Barnett, who was not involved in the study, noted that the link between more TV viewing and an increased risk of coronary artery disease—and the lack of a link between heart disease and using a computer or tablet—has been seen before.

Why Is TV Bad For Your Heart?

According to Barnett, there could be several reasons why television viewing has a negative association with heart disease that using a computer or tablet does not. For example, it’s common to see ads for food on TV, which could trigger people to eat more. Many people snack while they watch TV and may miss cues that they are full.

Barnett said that a person who is reading a book, texting, or talking on the phone is engaged and actively taking part in the activity. On the other hand, they’re more likely to be passively sitting while watching TV.

“I want to know for those that were watching less television, what were they doing instead?” said Barnett. “I would have been very interested in seeing where that time went, what was it replaced with.”

Kim added that TV watching also tends to be prolonged and happens after an evening meal. Blood levels of both glucose (sugar) and cholesterol could be affected by this pattern of eating and then being sedentary.

If you find you’re watching well over an hour of TV a day, Barnett said you don’t have to scale back all at once.

“Even if we’re going from five to four hours, or four to three, or three to two, that’s an improvement,” she said.

Barnett noted that the American Heart Association recommends people try to break up their TV viewing time—for example, by getting up from the chair every 15 or 20 minutes.

What This Means For You

A new study has found an association between the hours a person spends watching television each day and their risk for coronary heart disease. Reducing your TV time, as well as taking other steps to promote heart health, may help lower your heart disease risk—particularly if you are at a higher risk because of your genes.

By Valerie DeBenedette


Health writing, Pharmaceuticals


Fairfield University


  • More than 30 years of experience writing about health and medicine.
  • Specializes in writing about women’s health, health policy, and pharmacy.

As a writer I try to take a topic, turn it over and look at it from every angle. I try to explain complicated subjects without talking down to the reader and without jargon.

— Valerie DeBenedette


Valerie DeBenedette has been writing about health and medicine (among other topics) for more than 30 years. Her work has appeared in magazines, newsletters, newspapers, and websites for both healthcare professionals and consumers. While she has written about almost every area of medicine, she has written most frequently on pharmacy and pharmaceuticals, women’s health, health policy, surgery, dermatology, and ophthalmology.

Valerie is a longtime contributor to Drug Topics, and a former managing editor of that magazine. Some of her nonmedical writing has appeared in Mental Floss. She is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.


Valerie has a Bachelor’s Degree in Biology from Fairfield University.

(Source:; June 16, 2022;