Children’s Health Defense Skyhorse author on Vax Unvax Let The Science Speak
We’re focusing on the vax-unvax topic this week. Neil Z. Miller shared his work An Association Between Childhood Vaccines and Mortality with us on Monday. Children’s Health Defense’s The Defender is publishing co-author Dr. Brian Hooker’s chapter summaries Vax-Unvax Let The Science Speak, from CHD and Skyhorse Publishing. Of note is Dr. Hooker’s discussion of his work with the Geiers many years ago. When the Geiers suggested Lupron to lower testosterone as a means to remove mercury from the body to ameliorate autism behaviors, they were pilloried as barbaric. Today, Lupron is one of the drugs used and praised for gender dysphoria. “Let the science speak,” exposes the censorship that has surrounded vaccine science for decades. Meanwhile, the epidemic of physically and emotionally unwell kids roils on and on to what end? Your purchase of Vax-Unvax Let The Science Speak supports Age of Autism.
###
By Dr. Brian Hooker
10 Years After HHS Asked CDC to Study Safety of Childhood Vaccine Schedule, CDC Hasn’t Produced It
In Chapter 2 of “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and I present the very few studies examining the long-term and cumulative effects on children of administering all of the vaccines listed on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s infant/childhood vaccination schedule.
In 2013, the National Vaccine Program Office of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commissioned an update of earlier findings on the lack of evidence to support claims that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) infant/child vaccination schedule was safe.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee, charged with producing the update, found that “few studies have comprehensively assessed the association between the entire immunization schedule or variations in the overall schedule and categories of health outcomes, and no study has directly examined health outcomes and stakeholder concerns in precisely the way that the committee was charged to address in its statement of task.”
According to the IOM committee, “studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted.”
The lack of information on the overall safety of the vaccination schedule was so compelling that the committee then recommended HHS incorporate the study of the safety of the overall childhood immunization schedule into its processes for setting priorities for research, “recognizing stakeholder concerns, and establishing the priorities on the basis of epidemiological evidence, biological plausibility, and feasibility.”
The IOM also recommended the CDC use its private database, the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), to study the overall health effects of the vaccination schedule using retrospective analyses.
Ten years later, the CDC has yet to do such a comparison study, even though it is sitting on a vast repository of data in the VSD, which include comprehensive medical records for more than 10 million individuals and 2 million children.
The VSD also contains records for a significant number of unvaccinated children, yet the CDC refuses to compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children.
The CDC also prohibits VSD outside researchers from accessing the VSD data so they can do the studies.
I was fortunate enough to be one of the researchers who had VSD access as I worked with Dr. Mark R. Geier and his son, David Geier, on a series of studies on thimerosal-containing vaccines in the early 2010s.
However, the CDC subsequently revoked the Geiers’ access because one of the health maintenance organizations (HMO) participating in the VSD project did not like the results the Geiers were obtaining, tying thimerosal exposure to a variety of childhood chronic disorders including autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), birth defects, acute ethylmercury poisoning, fetal/infant/childhood death, premature puberty, emotional disturbance, tic disorder and developmental delays.
Read rest of the article and subscribe to The Defender HERE.
Based on over one hundred studies in the peer-reviewed literature that consider vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. Each of these studies is analyzed and put in context of the difference in health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated infants, children, and adults. Given the massive push to vaccinate the entire global population, this book is timely and necessary for individuals to make informed choices for themselves and their families.
Related Stories
- Neil Z. Miller: An Association Between Childhood Vaccines and Mortality
- Children’s Health Defense Report: Grassroots Backlash Helps Defeat D.C. Schools COVID Vaccine Mandate
- Keep Knitting
For the rest of this article please go to source link below.