Canaries in the human DNA mine

0
70
Canaries in the human DNA mine


Canaries in the human DNA mine

 by Julian Gillespie

IAN BRIGHTHOPE

I have always contended that we must leave mother nature alone to perform her functions.

Her control centres of life and their blueprints, the DNA and RNA molecules in the nuclei of our cells, must be regarded as near to perfect. To believe that human technology can perform better than nature, abuse her blueprints, manipulate them and use them to protect healthy organisms is the ultimate in hubris. With the advent of Covid we have seen this wanton arrogance in nearly every sphere of medico-scientific endeavour. There is mounting evidence that the mRNA vaccines are race-specific bioweapons.

My plea now is for people worldwide to be informed about these synthetic viruses and the related mRNA ‘vaccines’. Furthermore the laboratories must be shut down.

Please download Julian Gillespie’s paper and share as widely as possible.

Canaries in the Human DNA Mine

Abstract

Decades of sophisticated and detailed legislation created to safeguard humanity from exposure to genetically modified organisms was ignored or legislated away in an instant when SARS-CoV-2 arrived. This banishment was done with intention and not for the good of humanity. The lipid nanoparticles containing modified RNAs, the so-called “vaccines”, from the beginning fulfilled the legal definitions for being categorized as genetically modified organisms. Pfizer, Moderna, and regulators all knew this. The claims by Pfizer and Moderna repeated by regulators and complicit politicians that modified RNAs do not enter the cell nucleus and reverse transcribe into the human genome were lies constructed knowingly. Over four decades of scientific knowledge that started with a Nobel Prize pointed to modified RNAs integrating into the human genome. The knowledge of retroposition preceded the use of modified RNAs in response to the pandemic, but the WHO and regulatory experts did not want to inform the global population about these facts. This article retraces the steps in a sophisticated deception played out in legal language, technical scientific jargon, and medical bodies pretending to serve public health.

We now stand upon a transgenic frontier by the making of regulators everywhere, and the WHO. Make no mistake, every modern country has its gene technology experts charged with keeping medicines regulators up-to-speed with all things genetically modified, or that should be deemed to be genetically modified organisms, until proven otherwise.

In Australia, that failed government agency is the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, staffed as it is with Australia’s acknowledged experts, was meant to step-in and hold Pfizer and Moderna to account, by first having them submit and assist complete a Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan, just like AstraZeneca was required to do with its COVID-19 drug (despite that too being another failure by the OGTR).

The European Medicines Agency failed humanity too when it turned a blind eye to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 GMOs. Clearly, a corruption continues to transpire. The depths of coordination and complicity were and remain extraordinary but were achievable with sophisticated global communications and long-compromised political structures that long ago stopped serving the people for anything, but fear.

The closing gentle observations by Associate Professor Domazet-Loso raise nothing but appropriate cynical implications:

The mRNA vaccinology field started its development more than 30 years ago [66, [67] and L1 retroelements in humans have been studied for more than 40 years [68],[69] but obviously without any crosstalk between the two fields  . . .

. . .  Unfortunately, all of this creates an impression that L1-driven retroposition is a kind of taboo topic in mRNA vaccinology.

When new drugs constructed with the elements of our genes are introduced seemingly out of nowhere, and within months are scaled-up for a global population told “everything is fine, just take it, or else”  . . .  the failure to acknowledge over four decades of science speaking to the genetic risks associated with the drugs was never an oversight  . . .  it involved concerted planning and intention, involving a criminal avoidance of the real science at all costs.

The implications are now staggering and the canaries in our DNA mine are screaming.

Click the Link to read the full article.

Share Ian Brighthope’s Substack



By Ian Brighthope

@IANBRIGHTHOPE

I am a physician with 49 years of practice, an academic, an agricultural scientist and I have a postgraduate fellowship in nutritional and environmental medicine.

FACEBOOK

Ian Brighthope’s Substack

By Ian Brighthope

My personal Substack

(Source: ianbrighthope.substack.com; July 19, 2023; https://tinyurl.com/227a6xuj)